I immediately wanted to write a blog/review of the book, even though I'm not finished. While I thought I could wait, something happened this morning that encouraged me to go ahead. Before my first class this morning, I saw an old student of mine. He was in my World Lit class last semester, and he too, is reading the series. We began discussing the first book, the HBO series, and ultimately science fiction/fantasy genre in general.
I've always loved sci-fi/fantasy, both in television/movies and books. But, I have to admit, I haven't read as many books in the genre as I would like. Namely, because I'm a woman, I find that I enjoy reading books written by women about women as opposed to masculine lit. And the sci-fi genre is dominated by men. (It also turns me off when a title or cover is cheesy, and let's face it, many fantasy novels have cheesy covers and titles. I know, I know, don't judge a book by its cover). I read an article yesterday on Salon that addressed the issue of women writers, and I guess it justified my feelings somewhat about my proclivity for women novelists AND made me feel ashamed for doing what so many men do. In her article about V.S. Naipul's recent slam on women writers (particularly Jane Austen), Mary Elizabeth Williams explains:
Bravo! I literally cheered. Williams goes on to explain what we already know, that of course women write differently than men do; they even write about different subjects, because the female experience is unique; it is not the male experience, but that doesn't mean that it is less than. As a woman, I like it when I find someone who points this out, who speaks up. But, then I had to think about my wariness of male writers. I typically (and wrongly) don't want to read contemporary male authors. (Men like Dickens, and Collins, and Twain, and Hawthorne) don't bother me so much. So, I wondered, am I doing exactly the same thing? I do read male writers' works, but if put in front of me, I would probably gravitate more to the woman writer. And I don't think that's fair. Just because it is different does not make it less important, or even less aesthetically pleasing. The real reason I don't like to read many contemporary male authors is because it makes me feel better if dead men who lived in a less tolerant time make quibs about women, but when modern men do, it infuriates me.Let's forget for a minute the millennia of restrictions that made a life of letters impossible for almost all women throughout history. Ignore the questions of whether women have had equal opportunity to write important books, and get right to the heart of Naipaul's assertion -- that they're incapable of doing it. Because what he's really getting at is a persistent attitude that runs rampant not just in the arts but in business, in sports, and anywhere men and women congregate: that the feminine is automatically unimportant and inferior, that "size and weight," so to speak, are the only criteria worth measuring.
So, now back to A Game of Thrones, a book written by a man. And it includes some really strong female characters, characters to love--and hate as the case may be. The novel is written in short chapters which are focalized through different characters, so the story comes together piece by piece. And I'm proud to say that I don't even try to rush through the male characters' sections. Perhaps there is hope for us all to become even more enlightened!
BTW, I highly recommend the book, and the summer is the perfect time for reading it--after summer, winter will come. (That makes sense once you've read the book). And I promise, I will write a real review of it as soon as I'm finished!